Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Love or Commitment? Which is better to have?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bèlla" data-source="post: 77627907" data-attributes="member: 416395"><p>I know someone who doesn't love his companions but they love him in return and seem devoted. I don't think he's incapable of love. I suspect he chooses partners that allow him to maintain that stance. But there's a craving for something more that peeks out every now and then. </p><p></p><p>For me, love and commitment are intertwined and duty is the alternative. As it pertains to a companion, love may foster a sense of duty that reflects my commitment. But I will not have a man I don't love. Irrespective of his desire or qualities. I won't force the issue. </p><p></p><p>On the other hand, [USER=326155]@RDKirk[/USER] raises important questions. That's the tricky part if we're honest. Especially for singles. <em>Most of us</em> could have settled a long time ago. But we're holding out for this and that. </p><p></p><p>I have two songs in my head. Which is right? </p><p></p><p>I Would Do Anything for Love but I Won't Do That (Meatloaf)</p><p>Just for Your Love (Memphis Horns)</p><p></p><p>I'm in the latter camp. That's my nature with God in mind of course. But both perspectives have merit.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #0abab5">~bella</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bèlla, post: 77627907, member: 416395"] I know someone who doesn't love his companions but they love him in return and seem devoted. I don't think he's incapable of love. I suspect he chooses partners that allow him to maintain that stance. But there's a craving for something more that peeks out every now and then. For me, love and commitment are intertwined and duty is the alternative. As it pertains to a companion, love may foster a sense of duty that reflects my commitment. But I will not have a man I don't love. Irrespective of his desire or qualities. I won't force the issue. On the other hand, [USER=326155]@RDKirk[/USER] raises important questions. That's the tricky part if we're honest. Especially for singles. [I]Most of us[/I] could have settled a long time ago. But we're holding out for this and that. I have two songs in my head. Which is right? I Would Do Anything for Love but I Won't Do That (Meatloaf) Just for Your Love (Memphis Horns) I'm in the latter camp. That's my nature with God in mind of course. But both perspectives have merit. [COLOR=#0abab5]~bella[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Love or Commitment? Which is better to have?
Top
Bottom