Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Kid's Corporal Punishment - a Risk to Mental Health
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevevw" data-source="post: 77663239" data-attributes="member: 342064"><p>Actually it was about affirmative action to equalise society. Giving special attention and priviledge to one group and not others. </p><p></p><p>Its got everything to do with this. If policies are discouraging or encouraging one gender more than another in society then this makes it harder or easier to support particular setups for genders within relationship. Family friendly policies may allow more flexible work/home arrangeement, economic policies may make it hard to live off one income ect.</p><p></p><p>So we have two kinds of control in society, one with violence and abuse and the other without. Its the violent and abusive use of control to deny another. But not necessarily the control, the non violent and abusive control. The necessary control society needs to function.</p><p></p><p>But we have to determine what is abusive right. Its only abusive if your intention is to abuse and harm another unjustly. A persons words or actions that may deny or offend or even harm another and they may have non abusive intentions but this may be taken or seen as abusive by another or even a sector of society. </p><p></p><p>So we have to first determine what the truth is, the facts. Often individual and group rights will conflict and supporting one groups rights may deny another groups. That is the problem with identity woke politics. </p><p></p><p>Well we often enforce rigid roles as a society and most accept this. Look at covid restrictions. Look at prison or the many restrictions we place on people in society if they have breached the law or social conventions. Look at codes of conduct which force people to rigid behavioural roles even outside work. </p><p></p><p>Looks like I need some evidence for the next reply so will be back soon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevevw, post: 77663239, member: 342064"] Actually it was about affirmative action to equalise society. Giving special attention and priviledge to one group and not others. Its got everything to do with this. If policies are discouraging or encouraging one gender more than another in society then this makes it harder or easier to support particular setups for genders within relationship. Family friendly policies may allow more flexible work/home arrangeement, economic policies may make it hard to live off one income ect. So we have two kinds of control in society, one with violence and abuse and the other without. Its the violent and abusive use of control to deny another. But not necessarily the control, the non violent and abusive control. The necessary control society needs to function. But we have to determine what is abusive right. Its only abusive if your intention is to abuse and harm another unjustly. A persons words or actions that may deny or offend or even harm another and they may have non abusive intentions but this may be taken or seen as abusive by another or even a sector of society. So we have to first determine what the truth is, the facts. Often individual and group rights will conflict and supporting one groups rights may deny another groups. That is the problem with identity woke politics. Well we often enforce rigid roles as a society and most accept this. Look at covid restrictions. Look at prison or the many restrictions we place on people in society if they have breached the law or social conventions. Look at codes of conduct which force people to rigid behavioural roles even outside work. Looks like I need some evidence for the next reply so will be back soon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Kid's Corporal Punishment - a Risk to Mental Health
Top
Bottom