Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halbhh" data-source="post: 76884497" data-attributes="member: 375234"><p>heh heh, not so fast.</p><p></p><p> A 'soul' isn't something we can explain/characterize hardly at all. It's like....<em>dark matter</em> -- not yet characterized, not yet observed.</p><p></p><p>A soul is either</p><p></p><p>A) non-physical (meaning it's not in this physics of this natural world/universe, or alternatively, (A2) perhaps is in physics of this universe but in as-yet-undiscovered physics)</p><p></p><p>OR</p><p></p><p>B) possibly even something operating on already known physics, but simply a phenomena we haven't yet observed, thus cannot characterize, etc.</p><p></p><p>Either way one couldn't make assertions about it yet.</p><p></p><p>If nature teaches anything to us, it should teach that we know only a portion of even of what is all around us -- many things waiting to be discovered. </p><p></p><p> Even here on Earth, new things are being discovered constantly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halbhh, post: 76884497, member: 375234"] heh heh, not so fast. A 'soul' isn't something we can explain/characterize hardly at all. It's like....[I]dark matter[/I] -- not yet characterized, not yet observed. A soul is either A) non-physical (meaning it's not in this physics of this natural world/universe, or alternatively, (A2) perhaps is in physics of this universe but in as-yet-undiscovered physics) OR B) possibly even something operating on already known physics, but simply a phenomena we haven't yet observed, thus cannot characterize, etc. Either way one couldn't make assertions about it yet. If nature teaches anything to us, it should teach that we know only a portion of even of what is all around us -- many things waiting to be discovered. Even here on Earth, new things are being discovered constantly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
Top
Bottom