Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Historical Creationism: Literal Genesis, Old Earth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Job 33:6" data-source="post: 75995732" data-attributes="member: 399299"><p>Though you were given literally lists of transitional fossils in this very thread. Here's an entire thread just for you (see link below). And Gould also acknowledged what he has referred to as an abundance of transitional fossils.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.christianforums.com/threads/proving-that-links-exist.8210047/" target="_blank">Proving that Links Exist</a></p><p></p><p>How can you say that transitional fossils weren't found if we have lists of them?</p><p></p><p>Alternatively, how could it be suggested that these lists of fossils don't support the theory of evolution when they all fit perfectly into a fossil succession that directly matches cladistics based phylogenies of other fields of study?</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]-CvX_mD5weM[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Job 33:6, post: 75995732, member: 399299"] Though you were given literally lists of transitional fossils in this very thread. Here's an entire thread just for you (see link below). And Gould also acknowledged what he has referred to as an abundance of transitional fossils. [URL='https://www.christianforums.com/threads/proving-that-links-exist.8210047/']Proving that Links Exist[/URL] How can you say that transitional fossils weren't found if we have lists of them? Alternatively, how could it be suggested that these lists of fossils don't support the theory of evolution when they all fit perfectly into a fossil succession that directly matches cladistics based phylogenies of other fields of study? [MEDIA=youtube]-CvX_mD5weM[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Historical Creationism: Literal Genesis, Old Earth
Top
Bottom