Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Historical Creationism: Literal Genesis, Old Earth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Estrid" data-source="post: 75970388" data-attributes="member: 433007"><p>Instead of thinking aboutva "lengthy debate", ( at the end of</p><p>which everything is the same) why not consider, for just a</p><p>moment, that the are people here much better informed than</p><p>you, and, instead of trying to argue with mistaken ideas, you</p><p>take advantage of an opportunity to learn new and interesting things?</p><p></p><p>For example- Australopithicus is far from the only</p><p>humanoid, science does not "prove" things, and,</p><p>they, like the rest of us are apes, so hard to prove</p><p>they weren't.</p><p></p><p>As for bipedal walking, actually that is easy to</p><p>demonstrate.</p><p></p><p>Any beliefs based on scanty and sometimes faulty info could</p><p>stand a touch up, don't you think so?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Estrid, post: 75970388, member: 433007"] Instead of thinking aboutva "lengthy debate", ( at the end of which everything is the same) why not consider, for just a moment, that the are people here much better informed than you, and, instead of trying to argue with mistaken ideas, you take advantage of an opportunity to learn new and interesting things? For example- Australopithicus is far from the only humanoid, science does not "prove" things, and, they, like the rest of us are apes, so hard to prove they weren't. As for bipedal walking, actually that is easy to demonstrate. Any beliefs based on scanty and sometimes faulty info could stand a touch up, don't you think so? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Historical Creationism: Literal Genesis, Old Earth
Top
Bottom