Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Non-Mainstream and Controversial Science
Flat Earth And Christianity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Liturgist" data-source="post: 77371621" data-attributes="member: 424341"><p>Having read the works of the major proponents of Eugenics, I feel confident in asserting their entire theory is predicated on a misinterpretation of the idea of natural selection.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, as I said I have no allegiance to creationists, but it is the case that one can use simple metaphysics, which i described, to reconcile their beliefs with science, provided one is willing to discard the principle of parsimony as expressed by Occam’s Razor. I myself don’t care about this, since it is to a certain extent irrelevant and unknowable, but I cannot condemn a creationist for being unscientific without going into further detail about what they believe. I have met some who are, to be sure, for example, those who deny that evolution existed or who falsely claim that cavemen lived alongside dinosaurs, which is a fabulous fallacious faux pas outside the fantasy of the Flintstones.</p><p></p><p>But you left my main question unanswered: why make Christians the subject of your “anthropological observations”, when the Muslims officially believe in creationism, and unlike Christianity, believe that Muhammed taught that the world was flat, and this view is made clear in both the Quran and the Hadiths?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Liturgist, post: 77371621, member: 424341"] Having read the works of the major proponents of Eugenics, I feel confident in asserting their entire theory is predicated on a misinterpretation of the idea of natural selection. Furthermore, as I said I have no allegiance to creationists, but it is the case that one can use simple metaphysics, which i described, to reconcile their beliefs with science, provided one is willing to discard the principle of parsimony as expressed by Occam’s Razor. I myself don’t care about this, since it is to a certain extent irrelevant and unknowable, but I cannot condemn a creationist for being unscientific without going into further detail about what they believe. I have met some who are, to be sure, for example, those who deny that evolution existed or who falsely claim that cavemen lived alongside dinosaurs, which is a fabulous fallacious faux pas outside the fantasy of the Flintstones. But you left my main question unanswered: why make Christians the subject of your “anthropological observations”, when the Muslims officially believe in creationism, and unlike Christianity, believe that Muhammed taught that the world was flat, and this view is made clear in both the Quran and the Hadiths? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Non-Mainstream and Controversial Science
Flat Earth And Christianity
Top
Bottom