Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derf" data-source="post: 77436084" data-attributes="member: 436903"><p>I don't know that, nor do you, since most of the ones used for dinosaurs are longer age tests, while the shorter ones are not used on dinosaurs, except to give uncharacteristicly short ages. Remember that the biblical account describes a drastic change in the water cycle, introducing rainbows, which probably means rain was new at the flood. What other things might have changed? I don't know for sure, but earth's magnetic field is high on the list, maybe lessening to allow much more C14 to form. If so, then the tests aren't accurate when the dates cross the flood era. They can be used for a max, but not exact. All of our tests rely on observations of decay rates and initial mother/daughter ratios <strong>that we cannot observe in the past</strong>.</p><p></p><p>And we have evidence of widely varying dates on the same animal:</p><p>"Mammoth was carbon dated one part dated 29,500 and the other 44,000—same animal! “</p><p></p><p>Troy L Pewre, Quaternary Stratigraphic, Geological Survey Professional Papers 862 1975 p. 30</p><p></p><p>Quoted from <a href="https://www.evolutionisamyth.com/dating-methods/carbon-14-dating-inaccurate-on-mammoth-skin/" target="_blank">CARBON 14 DATING INACCURATE ON MAMMOTH SKIN – Evolution is a Myth</a></p><p></p><p>By the way, those mammoth dates are on either side of the <a href="https://www.christianforums.com/threads/a-short-explaination-of-the-human-nature.8283313/post-77435674" target="_blank">C14 date of the dinosaur</a>. So while dates may vary widely enough not to be counted as precise, they may be accurately showing exactly what you say should be happening.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derf, post: 77436084, member: 436903"] I don't know that, nor do you, since most of the ones used for dinosaurs are longer age tests, while the shorter ones are not used on dinosaurs, except to give uncharacteristicly short ages. Remember that the biblical account describes a drastic change in the water cycle, introducing rainbows, which probably means rain was new at the flood. What other things might have changed? I don't know for sure, but earth's magnetic field is high on the list, maybe lessening to allow much more C14 to form. If so, then the tests aren't accurate when the dates cross the flood era. They can be used for a max, but not exact. All of our tests rely on observations of decay rates and initial mother/daughter ratios [B]that we cannot observe in the past[/B]. And we have evidence of widely varying dates on the same animal: "Mammoth was carbon dated one part dated 29,500 and the other 44,000—same animal! “ Troy L Pewre, Quaternary Stratigraphic, Geological Survey Professional Papers 862 1975 p. 30 Quoted from [URL="https://www.evolutionisamyth.com/dating-methods/carbon-14-dating-inaccurate-on-mammoth-skin/"]CARBON 14 DATING INACCURATE ON MAMMOTH SKIN – Evolution is a Myth[/URL] By the way, those mammoth dates are on either side of the [URL='https://www.christianforums.com/threads/a-short-explaination-of-the-human-nature.8283313/post-77435674']C14 date of the dinosaur[/URL]. So while dates may vary widely enough not to be counted as precise, they may be accurately showing exactly what you say should be happening. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
Top
Bottom