Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derf" data-source="post: 77435609" data-attributes="member: 436903"><p>Of course. But it starts with that. Isn't that what Charles Darwin did...presented his "story" to explain what he thought he was seeing in his investigations? And then proofs or disproofs come. Evolution's "proofs" were wimpy, at best, and disproofs are piling up.</p><p></p><p>Institute of Creation's RATE study confirmed </p><p>1. That measurable amounts of C14 was present in <a href="https://creation.com/diamonds-a-creationists-best-friend#objections" target="_blank">diamonds </a>and <a href="https://dl0.creation.com/articles/p066/c06685/chapter4.pdf" target="_blank">coal </a>(more than just background levels)</p><p>2. That large amounts of radioactivity occurred (no reference as both sides agree with this point)</p><p>3. That diffusion of the radioactivity byproducts (e.g. helium nuclei) was too slow for the radioactivity to have occurred over millions of years</p><p>4. <a href="https://creation.com/the-pigs-took-it-all" target="_blank">That different long-age dating techniques give discordant results</a></p><p></p><p>Here's a link where you can go view their results: <a href="https://www.icr.org/research/rate/" target="_blank">The RATE Project</a>. I bought the technical books back when they first came out, but I lost my copies in a fire. Unfortunately, you have to review piecemeal articles (they're free). I don't know if the books are still for sale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derf, post: 77435609, member: 436903"] Of course. But it starts with that. Isn't that what Charles Darwin did...presented his "story" to explain what he thought he was seeing in his investigations? And then proofs or disproofs come. Evolution's "proofs" were wimpy, at best, and disproofs are piling up. Institute of Creation's RATE study confirmed 1. That measurable amounts of C14 was present in [URL='https://creation.com/diamonds-a-creationists-best-friend#objections']diamonds [/URL]and [URL='https://dl0.creation.com/articles/p066/c06685/chapter4.pdf']coal [/URL](more than just background levels) 2. That large amounts of radioactivity occurred (no reference as both sides agree with this point) 3. That diffusion of the radioactivity byproducts (e.g. helium nuclei) was too slow for the radioactivity to have occurred over millions of years 4. [URL='https://creation.com/the-pigs-took-it-all']That different long-age dating techniques give discordant results[/URL] Here's a link where you can go view their results: [URL="https://www.icr.org/research/rate/"]The RATE Project[/URL]. I bought the technical books back when they first came out, but I lost my copies in a fire. Unfortunately, you have to review piecemeal articles (they're free). I don't know if the books are still for sale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
Top
Bottom