Search results

Numbrs.6: 24-26 24 The Lord bless you and watch, guard, and keep you; 25 The Lord make His face to shine upon and enlighten you and be gracious (kind, merciful, and giving favor) to you; 26 The Lord lift up His [approving] countenance upon you and give you peace (tranquility of heart and...

When we all get to heaven

When the roll is called up yonder

The problem is not a lack of evidence. The problem is whether or not people acknowledge it as evidence. That is what I mean. The flood of Noah is only acknowledged in terms that atheists are comfortable to address it. They steal the true cause and reassign it to an evolutionary occurrence.

But atheists are not capable of being intellectually dishonest. That is your opinion. I know that the Bible does not claim to be a science book and is not a means of teaching archeology. More archeology is continuing to be done to disprove that statement.

Such evidence you simply ignore and deny it's existence.

Just because you ignore or discredit them doesn't make them non existent. Do you deny that atheists have had official debates with creation scientists? I am not a creation scientist but I've heard and seen the archeology that proves there was. Such are the topics that creation scientists have...

That's right. When science is used without hostility against the Bible, I agree with it. I don't use the phrase "falsely called science". I don't have a love hate attitude toward it. Science does not disprove the Bible. But science minded person's, atheists like yourself seek to disprove the...

I am addressing the issue. Whether the light is day 1 God's own light shining out from Him.. or day 4 the solar light. The result of day and night is the same. With the distinction that the God-light on day 1 is different (not created) than the solar light on day 4 (created). I have not ever...

I am stating that the global flood of Noah is literal. I am saying that the archeology of creation scientists is evidence, therefore I am stating that it is not fiction.

It was not a separation on day 4. It was the creation of the sun on day 4. In Genesis two the narrative describes focus of events after day 7 when God finished creating. The entirety involving Adam and Eve. Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are different. There is no contradiction. Yes there are...

I disagree with your limited views.

As you demonstrate each time with your interpretations. Stating that there are contradictions can be due to interpretive bias also. Many contradictions are due to translation error, or scribal copy error. And the erroneous idea of the Bible publishers or the critical text scholars not to...

The Sumerian King list, history's first mention of a great flood dating at 2100 BC. There are many other examples that can be found on internet.

There are two directions of interpretation. 1. Reading the text as it is. 2. Adding one's own bias to it. There are additional methods as well. There are many archaeological findings that attest to historical validity in Genesis.

That is what interpretation is all about.

I would agree with what another in this thread said.. dreams are not always from the Lord.

Dreams can be metaphoric rather than literal. Perhaps it's a relationship matter with God and not concerning some girl in your church. Pray and ask God for the meaning, or interpretation of the dream.

Read it. Agreed.

Read it. Agreed.