Search results

Sorry, I did not make myself clear. What is you did not understand?

Or political opponents jailed

Seems it is what the trial was based off of. A non disclosure agreement .

Nobody should have to tell anyone. It has been in the news. LOL, You want to play games.

We will se if what was done in that court was in fact legal. But Biden and the demo's want to get that mile or two out of it. Seems you like it too. It is legal bribery.....pay me or else. Paying people to not disclose something about you is bribery. That is legal so they cannot continue on to...

It isn't illegal. It is in fact legal. What do you call a pay me or else? But it is not illegal. It was not the only one he paid, which later, was proved a lie. But Trump paid for that to go away too, rather than pay to go through court, which more than likely would have cost more than the NDA.

It was for a non disclosure agreement... Which you agree. It was payment for a non disclosure agreement. A legal expense. It cost money to have someone sign a non disclosure. That was what the payment was for... No it is not the same. Trump did not pay for a car, or any other personal...

The illegal campaign contribution is a secondary crime. Non disclosure agreement, legally binding document, paid for. Legal expense Secondary crime NON DISCLOSURE agreement becomes an election crime. How so?

How about caring about a better justice system where justice is applied.

The "NOT ACTUALLY THAT" is the secondary crime. 1. COHEN paid stormy Daniels money to not disclose, they signed the agreement. A legal document, legally binding. OK 2. What is the secondary offense That made it a federal election CRIME? Make "not actually that" coherent for us all.

The case was in Colorado in the first place because STATE LAW (three lousy judges) had no right to ADJUDICATE FEDERAL CANDIDATES ELIGABILITY. 3 lousy people.......... Here we are again. A few people with hatred running amuk trying to take control over who can do what, who can think what. Then...

De ja vu Colorado all over again. State vs federal. the state cannot make INTENT FEDERAL ELECTION LAW WHEN IT IS NOT, concerning a non disclosure agreement..

Yeah Cohen has said a lot of things The FBI accepted it when it was dropped as a misdemeanor. Also the witness for Trump gave testimony to that. No this is where you are mixing up the original legal expense for an non disclosure, with the secondary crome of ELECTION FRAUD. NON DISCLOSURES are...

Then we will find out if umbrella unanimity is going to fly (does not look like it will, since another justice commented on a case it was done. Saying an umbrella conviction is unconstutional since it allows some jurors to agree or disagree with other jurors for conviction. Non unanimous. So...

I don't blame the jury, it was well predicted by Scholars that the jury was convinced a crime was there when there was none. This just one of the problems. I hope this gets out of new york to the supreme court.

No he was not allowed Witnesses, concerning election law. Yet he allowed COHEN to speak on election law from the witness stand. This will be settled in the appeals process. Even if it takes having to go beyond NEW YORK, to get there.

No that was the dead misdemeanor. It became ANOTHER SECONDARY CRIME A felony IF HE DID IT TO CHANGE THE ELECTION....INTENT, PURPOSE

And also testimony from a reputable witness to refute these testimonies. The justice department decided nothing was there. Cohen was unreliable. Also not allowed was an expert in election law. The Juudge would not allow that witness. But all of a sudden new attachment concerning the REASON HE...

Which the above were previously decided to not try him on. It was a dead misdemeanor/s, statute of limitation run out. It appears all these are piggy backing on INTENT being the unlawful act. His intent was Soley and only because of the election. Therefore should have been listed a campaign...

To come to legal agreement you do not need a lawyer? Come on. It is a nondisclosure document and agreement. A legal form of bribery. Since it seems that INTENT in the mind is at play here, Micheal Cohens intent could vary from Trumps. Did he want this agreement because of the election, or his...