Is the Biden administration interfering with the election?

eleos1954 said:

or it very well could be by natural occurrences ... according to science earth has been experiencing global warming/cooling periods throughout the ages ... even before the onset of humanity ... it's a debatable issue.

Click to expand...

Many lifeforms have changed the atmosphere and thus the climate. This is our change.

Hans Blaster said:

Many lifeforms have changed the atmosphere and thus the climate. This is our change.

Click to expand...

Many theories

eleos1954 said:

Many theories

Click to expand...

Is this an attempt to demonstrate that you don't know what a scientific theory is either?

Hans Blaster said:

Is this an attempt to demonstrate that you don't know what a scientific theory is either?

Click to expand...

I know what scientific theory is ....

Scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to revision ... science is never settled on many issues ... it's an ongoing investigation presenting possibilities.

eleos1954 said:

I know what scientific theory is ....

Click to expand...

Then act like it.

eleos1954 said:

Scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to revision ... science is never settled on many issues ... it's an ongoing investigation presenting possibilities.

Click to expand...

Hans Blaster said:

Then act like it.

Click to expand...

Whatever ... think what you like .... so will I

eleos1954 said:

or it very well could be by natural occurrences ... according to science earth has been experiencing global warming/cooling periods throughout the ages ... even before the onset of humanity ... it's a debatable issue.

Click to expand...

When graphed the data clearly shows this is not a historical trend. There is no serious debate that humans are not responsible for recent increases.

eleos1954 said:

or it very well could be by natural occurrences ... according to science earth has been experiencing global warming/cooling periods throughout the ages ... even before the onset of humanity ... it's a debatable issue.

Click to expand...

It's truely not.

The changes you refer to happenned over 100,000 years. AGW has happenned in 150.

Not comparable and absolutely NOT natural occurances. Scientists have already studied all possible alternatives.

rambot said:

It's truely not.

The changes you refer to happenned over 100,000 years. AGW has happenned in 150.

Not comparable and absolutely NOT natural occurances. Scientists have already studied all possible alternatives.

Click to expand...

Sure they have

BPPLEE said:

Sure they have

Click to expand...

Said the person who hasn't read about it.

Pray, which other natural phenomenon do you feel could explain the warming that hasn't been addressed by climatologists and other scientists.

rambot said:

Said the person who hasn't read about it.

Pray, which other natural phenomenon do you feel could explain the warming that hasn't been addressed by climatologists and other scientists.

Click to expand...

They only have data from the time they started keeping records. I’m going to stay out of this argument though. Peace out

BPPLEE said:

They only have data from the time they started keeping records. I’m going to stay out of this argument though. Peace out

Click to expand...

You seem confidently wrong and uninterested in learning new information that may help inform you but fair enough. Good luck.

rambot said:

You seem confidently wrong and uninterested in learning new information that may help inform you but fair enough. Good luck.

Click to expand...

They have data from before anyone recorded the data? Interesting.

eleos1954 said:

I know what scientific theory is ....

Scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to revision ... science is never settled on many issues ... it's an ongoing investigation presenting possibilities.

Click to expand...

Unfortunately it seems that many USA people are poorly educated.

It's not all bad though

in a speech to supporters, Trump touted how many different demographic groups he won in Nevada, declaring that "We won the evangelicals. We won with young. We won with old. We won with highly educated. We won with poorly educated," before exclaiming "I love the poorly educated!"

It just gets a bit awkward when the poorly educated go online and talk about academic things. They seem to prefer to talk and bestow their thoughts on things they are supremely ignorant of, rather than to do some research and educate themselves. They even like to argue with people that are educated in the topic at hand rather than to listen and learn.
I guess it takes a lot of effort to remain ignorant. It's fascinating process to watch.

"A fool knows a little and says a lot, a wise person knows a lot and says a little"

For those that have an interest in learning

A scientific theory is a well-established explanation of some aspect of the natural world. Theories come from scientific data and multiple experiments. While it is not possible to prove a theory, a single contrary result using the scientific method can disprove it. In other words, a theory is testable and falsifiable.

stevil said:

Unfortunately it seems that many USA people are poorly educated.

It's not all bad though

in a speech to supporters, Trump touted how many different demographic groups he won in Nevada, declaring that "We won the evangelicals. We won with young. We won with old. We won with highly educated. We won with poorly educated," before exclaiming "I love the poorly educated!"

It just gets a bit awkward when the poorly educated go online and talk about academic things. They seem to prefer to talk and bestow their thoughts on things they are supremely ignorant of, rather than to do some research and educate themselves. They even like to argue with people that are educated in the topic at hand rather than to listen and learn.
I guess it takes a lot of effort to remain ignorant. It's fascinating process to watch.

"A fool knows a little and says a lot, a wise person knows a lot and says a little"

For those that have an interest in learning

Scientific Theory Definition and Examples

Get the scientific theory definition and examples. Understand theory uses and limitations. Learn how a theory differs from a law in science.

sciencenotes.org

A scientific theory is a well-established explanation of some aspect of the natural world. Theories come from scientific data and multiple experiments. While it is not possible to prove a theory, a single contrary result using the scientific method can disprove it. In other words, a theory is testable and falsifiable.

Click to expand...

I’m genuinely impressed at your ability to use Google

BPPLEE said:

I’m genuinely impressed at your ability to use Google

Click to expand...

Unfortunately, a very simple and basic step such as using an internet search tool such as Google to find information is beyond some of the poorly educated.

BPPLEE said:

They have data from before anyone recorded the data? Interesting.

Click to expand...

They can measure things that happened earlier than humans were able to communicate via writing.

Is this a surprise?

eleos1954 said:

I know what scientific theory is ....

Scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to revision ... science is never settled on many issues ... it's an ongoing investigation presenting possibilities.

Click to expand...

It's kinda tricky...

Because more often than you'd think science IS settled...and then a new piece of research comes through to and that destabilizes theories.

There is a mischaracterization that many have of science where they take the phrase "science is never settled" and morph that into meaning "you can't trust the science because it's always changing". Either a direct meaning or an implied meaning. Either way, that is NOT really how science works.

rambot said:

They can measure things that happened earlier than humans were able to communicate via writing.

Is this a surprise?

Click to expand...

Calls for speculation
Our 4.54-billion-year-old planet probably experienced its hottest temperatures in its earliest days, when it was still colliding with other rocky debris (planetesimals) careening around the solar system. The heat of these collisions would have kept Earth molten, with top-of-the-atmosphere temperatures upward of 3,600° Fahrenheit.

Even after those first scorching millennia, however, the planet has often been much warmer than it is now. One of the warmest times was during the geologic period known as the Neoproterozoic, between 600 and 800 million years ago. Conditions were also frequently sweltering between 500 million and 250 million years ago. And within the last 100 million years, two major heat spikes occurred: the Cretaceous Hot Greenhouse (about 92 million years ago), and the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (about 56 million years ago).

So it’s been a lot hotter than our record temperatures

BPPLEE said:

Calls for speculation

Click to expand...

No, it doesn't. Why? Other scientists were skeptical, and then it was all confirmed.

Is it because you don't understand it?