Only ridiculous to an evoLike I said, you don't understand natural selection. If you did you wouldn't be making these ridiculous claims.
Apparently critical thinking is not for you
Upvote
0
Only ridiculous to an evoLike I said, you don't understand natural selection. If you did you wouldn't be making these ridiculous claims.
Evolution and natural selection.Can anyone explain what it took for a moth to gain owl eyes on ea wing? Owl are formidable predators recognized by would-be moth enemies.
Just wondering. View attachment 345574
Right, and I am in the process of evolving wings, why? Because I need them just like the moth needed owls eyesEvolution and natural selection.
Because you have a problem with owls attacking you?Right, and I am in the process of evolving wings, why? Because I need them just like the moth needed owls eyes
You said you’re evolving wings with eyes for the same reason the moths are.What?
Show me where I said “wings w eyes”You said you’re evolving wings with eyes for the same reason the moths are.
“Right, and I am in the process of evolving wings, why? Because I need them just like the moth needed owls eyes.”Show me where I said “wings w eyes”
By the definition you gave, there is no "code." No evolutionist will confirm the opposite whether they are atheists or not.Nothing encoded? Since you’re an atheist, you feel forced to deny reality.
Even evolutionists confirm the opposite of what you’re blabbering
If you could only comprehend the words before you“Right, and I am in the process of evolving wings, why? Because I need them just like the moth needed owls eyes.”
You can be snarky all you want, especially given that we can all see what you wrote. Your immediate leap to nastiness says more about you than it does about me.If you could only comprehend the words before you
Try to re comprehend b4 you finalize what you think I saidYou can be snarky all you want, especially given that we can all see what you wrote. Your immediate leap to nastiness says more about you than it does about me.
If you want to have an actual discussion, not one where you gaslight and lash out, let me know. In the meantime, nothing about this exchange is worthy of any more of my attention.Try to re comprehend b4 you finalize what you think I said
Fine, just don’t put the wrong words in my mouthIf you want to have an actual discussion, not one where you gaslight and lash out, let me know. In the meantime, nothing about this exchange is worthy of any more of my attention.
What's an "evo"?Only ridiculous to an evo
Apparently critical thinking is not for you
Sure. But NS creates nothing physical.What's an "evo"?
Mutations are the raw material natural selection selects from. Do you understand that?
Natural selection is a process. It modifies physical biological organisms.Sure. But NS creates nothing physical.
So?It’s 100% mutation dependent.
Analogies are often a poor way to explain things. I'm not sure what you think your point is.The carpenter is 100% ineffective w out being given hammer nails and wood.
The carpenter = NS
That mutation is a LOSS of genetic information, not a gain. 99.9999% of mutations are do nothing or cause diseases
If it's a loss of information there needs to be a metric and an objective method of measuring information... and I've never seen either for the Creationist versions of information.