Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Jan 6 Breach of the Capitol: Consequences & Repercussions III
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="essentialsaltes" data-source="post: 76573753" data-attributes="member: 294566"><p>General Jan 6-related Skullduggery</p><p></p><p><strong><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/02/trump-considered-blanket-pardons-for-jan-6-rioters-before-he-left-office-00004738?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 22px">Trump considered blanket pardons for Jan. 6 rioters before he left office</span></a></strong></p><p>The previously unreported conversations show the former president wasn't simply musing when he floated pardoning the rioters if he runs and wins in 2024.</p><p></p><p>"He thought if he could do it, these people would never have to testify or be deposed.”</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/26/trump-pierson-wren/" target="_blank">Backstage drama at Jan. 6 rally for Trump draws interest of House committee</a></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">A simmering feud between rally organizers, including longtime Trump adviser Katrina Pierson and Republican fundraiser Caroline Wren, over who should speak that day was boiling over, <strong>culminating in a call to the U.S. Park Police</strong>, according to interviews with people familiar with the incident as well as text messages and police radio recordings reviewed by The Washington Post.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">The call to police was made by Kylie Jane Kremer, executive director at Women for America First, a pro-Trump group that held the permit for the rally, who was aligned with Pierson in trying to keep some of Wren’s proposed speakers from addressing the crowd.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Wren, who was listed on the permit for the rally as a “VIP ADVISOR,” had with others organized an initial spreadsheet of potential speakers that included far-right conspiracy theorists such as Alex Jones and Ali Alexander, planning documents obtained by The Post show. [They were not on the final program.]</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">But on the morning of the event, Kremer grew concerned that Wren was rearranging seats and trying to move Jones and Alexander closer to the stage</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/03/trump-nsa-election/" target="_blank">Memo circulated among Trump allies advocated using NSA data in attempt to prove stolen election</a></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>The proposal to seize and analyze ‘NSA unprocessed raw signals data’ raises legal and ethical concerns that set it apart from other attempts that have come to light</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">ok, not strictly Jan 6, but still skullduggery.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="essentialsaltes, post: 76573753, member: 294566"] General Jan 6-related Skullduggery [B][URL='https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/02/trump-considered-blanket-pardons-for-jan-6-rioters-before-he-left-office-00004738?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark'][SIZE=6]Trump considered blanket pardons for Jan. 6 rioters before he left office[/SIZE][/URL][/B] The previously unreported conversations show the former president wasn't simply musing when he floated pardoning the rioters if he runs and wins in 2024. "He thought if he could do it, these people would never have to testify or be deposed.” [SIZE=6][B][URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/26/trump-pierson-wren/']Backstage drama at Jan. 6 rally for Trump draws interest of House committee[/URL][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=4]A simmering feud between rally organizers, including longtime Trump adviser Katrina Pierson and Republican fundraiser Caroline Wren, over who should speak that day was boiling over, [B]culminating in a call to the U.S. Park Police[/B], according to interviews with people familiar with the incident as well as text messages and police radio recordings reviewed by The Washington Post.[/SIZE] [SIZE=4] The call to police was made by Kylie Jane Kremer, executive director at Women for America First, a pro-Trump group that held the permit for the rally, who was aligned with Pierson in trying to keep some of Wren’s proposed speakers from addressing the crowd. Wren, who was listed on the permit for the rally as a “VIP ADVISOR,” had with others organized an initial spreadsheet of potential speakers that included far-right conspiracy theorists such as Alex Jones and Ali Alexander, planning documents obtained by The Post show. [They were not on the final program.] But on the morning of the event, Kremer grew concerned that Wren was rearranging seats and trying to move Jones and Alexander closer to the stage[/SIZE] [SIZE=6][B][URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/03/trump-nsa-election/']Memo circulated among Trump allies advocated using NSA data in attempt to prove stolen election[/URL][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=5][B]The proposal to seize and analyze ‘NSA unprocessed raw signals data’ raises legal and ethical concerns that set it apart from other attempts that have come to light[/B] [B][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=4]ok, not strictly Jan 6, but still skullduggery.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Jan 6 Breach of the Capitol: Consequences & Repercussions III
Top
Bottom