Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Conspiracy Theories
Fauci, Collins SQUASHED Lab Leak, Aimed To 'DISPROVE' Theory After A WEEK Of Debate: Report
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="probinson" data-source="post: 77135063" data-attributes="member: 121249"><p>There is. The government had regular meetings with social media and told them what to censor. I know, I know, you think they were just making "suggestions" and the social media companies made those decisions of what to censor all on their own. And if you believe that, I've got some oceanfront property in Arizona with your name on it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The government. The media. Big tech. Surely you're not engaging in historical revisionism to pretend like the lab-leak theory wasn't quickly and universally classified as a conspiracy theory, are you?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That remains to be seen. I'm very curious why there were those in our government that were so anxious to suppress discussion of the lab-leak theory.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Discussion of the lab-leak theory was deemed "disinformation" and discussion was stifled.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So you think scientists and "experts" should do all of their consulting in private and not have that discussion publicly in the interest of public trust and transparency? That <em>does</em> indeed seem like a strange idea of how science works.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="probinson, post: 77135063, member: 121249"] There is. The government had regular meetings with social media and told them what to censor. I know, I know, you think they were just making "suggestions" and the social media companies made those decisions of what to censor all on their own. And if you believe that, I've got some oceanfront property in Arizona with your name on it. The government. The media. Big tech. Surely you're not engaging in historical revisionism to pretend like the lab-leak theory wasn't quickly and universally classified as a conspiracy theory, are you? That remains to be seen. I'm very curious why there were those in our government that were so anxious to suppress discussion of the lab-leak theory. Discussion of the lab-leak theory was deemed "disinformation" and discussion was stifled. So you think scientists and "experts" should do all of their consulting in private and not have that discussion publicly in the interest of public trust and transparency? That [I]does[/I] indeed seem like a strange idea of how science works. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Conspiracy Theories
Fauci, Collins SQUASHED Lab Leak, Aimed To 'DISPROVE' Theory After A WEEK Of Debate: Report
Top
Bottom