Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
Evidence of Rome's existence before Homer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adventist Heretic" data-source="post: 77663457" data-attributes="member: 163213"><p>The conventional date of the fall of Troy is 1183 B.C. An alternate view is 1220 B.C.</p><p>That is the current theory, based on conventional chronology. Some want to revise the chronology and move the date between 850 BC and 880 BC. The Gap in Greek chronology called the Greed Dark Ages according to them is a "Myth" This gap is based on a bad ordering of Egyptian Chronology. If you revise EC then you revise Greek Chronology. Chronology is not a settled matter. There are dominant views and Alternate views. What is being proposed is an alternate view. </p><p></p><p>Why the conventional date is such a problem? It is because of how they order the Dynasties. Some Dynasties exist at the same time but are ordered sequentially. If you Reorder them in the proper sequence then you shorten the timeline.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adventist Heretic, post: 77663457, member: 163213"] The conventional date of the fall of Troy is 1183 B.C. An alternate view is 1220 B.C. That is the current theory, based on conventional chronology. Some want to revise the chronology and move the date between 850 BC and 880 BC. The Gap in Greek chronology called the Greed Dark Ages according to them is a "Myth" This gap is based on a bad ordering of Egyptian Chronology. If you revise EC then you revise Greek Chronology. Chronology is not a settled matter. There are dominant views and Alternate views. What is being proposed is an alternate view. Why the conventional date is such a problem? It is because of how they order the Dynasties. Some Dynasties exist at the same time but are ordered sequentially. If you Reorder them in the proper sequence then you shorten the timeline. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
Evidence of Rome's existence before Homer?
Top
Bottom