- Jan 7, 2024
- 1,497
- 169
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
The question is, WHY don't you believe that man walked on the moon?
Genesis 1
Read post above.
Upvote
0
The question is, WHY don't you believe that man walked on the moon?
Logic says that we can believe the word of those who are more knowledgeable than us and those who have had experiences that we haven't - unless there is evidence to the contrary.
I've never had a baby - but I believe the pregnancy/birth stories of those who were there and who experienced it.
I've never had chemotherapy - but I believe the eye witness accounts of those who have.
I wasn't there when America was discovered - but I have no doubt that it was and the media footage about Americans isn't all one big fake.
I wasn't there when you were born - but I'll take your word for it that you are a real person, so obviously you were.
So logic says that if 90% (a guess) of people say that the earth is a sphere and we know this partly because there are photographs which show it: and the other 10% of people say "no, not true; all faked", while showing no evidence of their claims, it is far more likely to be the majority who are correct. Especially if, within that majority, you have people who were there and can provide eye witness accounts, interviews and so on.
Says nothing about people walking on the moon.Genesis 1
No doubt because you don't want to answer my post..I couldn't help it
Says nothing about people walking on the moon.
No doubt because you don't want to answer my post..
Only with a ridiculous post about not playing with super glue.But I did answer your post, twice.
No, it doesn't.No, but Gen 1 does give us an inclination as to why the moon can never be walked upon, which would be they'd never get through the firmament.
You can't even get your interpretation straight. Genesis 1:17 says God set the sun and moon in the firmament, not beyond it, so even with your hyperliteral interpretation, they only have to reach, not penetrate beyond, the firmament to get to the moon.No, but Gen 1 does give us an inclination as to why the moon can never be walked upon, which would be they'd never get through the firmament.
You can repeat this nonsense all the time you want, but it still stands we have real evidence - photos, videos, rocks from the moon and even the laser mirrors installed there during Apollo missions. Also all the equipment, technology, people involved.They still made Hollywood movies didn't they ?
Fake.
How could they when they have never been & besides they still haven't got the right measurement of the distance to the moon.
Why are the ideas of the bronze-age Babylonia or Egypt so important to you? And before you start - no, Genesis 1 was not written by God. Nothing in the Bible was written by God.No, but Gen 1 does give us an inclination as to why the moon can never be walked upon, which would be they'd never get through the firmament.
You can't even get your interpretation straight. Genesis 1:17 says God set the sun and moon in the firmament, not beyond it, so even with your hyperliteral interpretation, they only have to reach, not penetrate beyond, the firmament to get to the moon.
rocks
people involved
Why are the ideas of the bronze-age Babylonia or Egypt so important to you? And before you start - no, Genesis 1 was not written by God. Nothing in the Bible was written by God.
This one was fake, as discovered by geologists and museum. Not by flat earthers, btw. Its great you trust mainstream scientists, space experts, museums and at least the Dutch people, now, though.A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood
No. These people were and are life-long professional experts in their fields and frequently also enthusiasts in their free time.A need to know basis.
The article states it was given to the Dutch prime minister by J. William Middendorf, the former American ambassador to the Netherlands, not by the astronauts. However, there is nothing to actually link the rock with any gift given by the ambassador. The rock and the card that is displayed with it in the museum were both among the personal effects of the former prime minister which his family sorted through after he died and it seems likely that they mistakenly linked the two. The card does not mention what was given, which could have been a bunch of flowers or a bottle of champagne. If it was something as valuable as a lunar rock sample it certainly would have mentioned it. There is also the fact that Willem Drees was an ex-prime minister who had retired a decade earlier and was nearly deaf and blind when he received the gift associated with the card. Why would the US ambassador give such a supposedly valuable gift to a relatively unknown former politician and not to the Dutch royal family? He wouldn't and didn't. Nor were any lunar rock samples given to anyone else at the event described.A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood
Try to ask more specifically.
A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood