Absolute proof.. can't deny.. the earth is flat

Apple Sky

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald
Site Supporter
Jan 7, 2024
1,497
169
south wales
✟38,605.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Logic says that we can believe the word of those who are more knowledgeable than us and those who have had experiences that we haven't - unless there is evidence to the contrary.
I've never had a baby - but I believe the pregnancy/birth stories of those who were there and who experienced it.
I've never had chemotherapy - but I believe the eye witness accounts of those who have.
I wasn't there when America was discovered - but I have no doubt that it was and the media footage about Americans isn't all one big fake.
I wasn't there when you were born - but I'll take your word for it that you are a real person, so obviously you were.

So logic says that if 90% (a guess) of people say that the earth is a sphere and we know this partly because there are photographs which show it: and the other 10% of people say "no, not true; all faked", while showing no evidence of their claims, it is far more likely to be the majority who are correct. Especially if, within that majority, you have people who were there and can provide eye witness accounts, interviews and so on.

a mr spock.jpg


I couldn't help it :tearsofjoy:
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
28,054
8,044
NW England
✟1,062,085.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Genesis 1
Says nothing about people walking on the moon.

Neither does it say anything about people discovering computers, the motor car, aeroplanes, penicillin etc etc.
But we know that all these things have happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trophy33
Upvote 0

Apple Sky

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald
Site Supporter
Jan 7, 2024
1,497
169
south wales
✟38,605.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Says nothing about people walking on the moon.

No, but Gen 1 does give us an inclination as to why the moon can never be walked upon, which would be they'd never get through the firmament.
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
28,054
8,044
NW England
✟1,062,085.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, but Gen 1 does give us an inclination as to why the moon can never be walked upon, which would be they'd never get through the firmament.
No, it doesn't.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,693
12,218
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,191,502.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
No, but Gen 1 does give us an inclination as to why the moon can never be walked upon, which would be they'd never get through the firmament.
You can't even get your interpretation straight. Genesis 1:17 says God set the sun and moon in the firmament, not beyond it, so even with your hyperliteral interpretation, they only have to reach, not penetrate beyond, the firmament to get to the moon.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,458
3,757
N/A
✟153,423.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
They still made Hollywood movies didn't they ?



Fake.



How could they when they have never been & besides they still haven't got the right measurement of the distance to the moon.
You can repeat this nonsense all the time you want, but it still stands we have real evidence - photos, videos, rocks from the moon and even the laser mirrors installed there during Apollo missions. Also all the equipment, technology, people involved.

You, on the other hand, have no evidence, just throwing "lies, fake" to every direction - its only an evidence of some kind of a social disorder of yours.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,458
3,757
N/A
✟153,423.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, but Gen 1 does give us an inclination as to why the moon can never be walked upon, which would be they'd never get through the firmament.
Why are the ideas of the bronze-age Babylonia or Egypt so important to you? And before you start - no, Genesis 1 was not written by God. Nothing in the Bible was written by God.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Apple Sky

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald
Site Supporter
Jan 7, 2024
1,497
169
south wales
✟38,605.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You can't even get your interpretation straight. Genesis 1:17 says God set the sun and moon in the firmament, not beyond it, so even with your hyperliteral interpretation, they only have to reach, not penetrate beyond, the firmament to get to the moon.

That's right - Genesis 1 says that God set the sun, moon and all the stars in the firmament, so how are they going to penetrate the firmament.
Nobody's said anything about the moon being beyond it.
 
Upvote 0

Apple Sky

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald
Site Supporter
Jan 7, 2024
1,497
169
south wales
✟38,605.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood

people involved

A need to know basis.
 
Upvote 0

Apple Sky

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald
Site Supporter
Jan 7, 2024
1,497
169
south wales
✟38,605.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why are the ideas of the bronze-age Babylonia or Egypt so important to you? And before you start - no, Genesis 1 was not written by God. Nothing in the Bible was written by God.

And what about the rest of Genesis ?
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,458
3,757
N/A
✟153,423.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood
This one was fake, as discovered by geologists and museum. Not by flat earthers, btw. Its great you trust mainstream scientists, space experts, museums and at least the Dutch people, now, though.

"During a showing in 2006, a space expert told the Rijksmuseum it was unlikely that NASA would have handed out moon rocks so shortly after Apollo returned to Earth.
Testing by researchers from Amsterdam's Free University determined the object was not moon rock."


Also, it was not given by the Apollo astronauts, but by the former US ambassador. Some articles get it confused because it happened during their tour in Holland.

The real Dutch moon rocks are in a natural history museum.

A need to know basis.
No. These people were and are life-long professional experts in their fields and frequently also enthusiasts in their free time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,693
12,218
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,191,502.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood
The article states it was given to the Dutch prime minister by J. William Middendorf, the former American ambassador to the Netherlands, not by the astronauts. However, there is nothing to actually link the rock with any gift given by the ambassador. The rock and the card that is displayed with it in the museum were both among the personal effects of the former prime minister which his family sorted through after he died and it seems likely that they mistakenly linked the two. The card does not mention what was given, which could have been a bunch of flowers or a bottle of champagne. If it was something as valuable as a lunar rock sample it certainly would have mentioned it. There is also the fact that Willem Drees was an ex-prime minister who had retired a decade earlier and was nearly deaf and blind when he received the gift associated with the card. Why would the US ambassador give such a supposedly valuable gift to a relatively unknown former politician and not to the Dutch royal family? He wouldn't and didn't. Nor were any lunar rock samples given to anyone else at the event described.
It isn't clear where Drees got the petrified wood that was among his personal effects but he didn't get it from the ambassador and certainly not from the astronauts. It had nothing to do with the card that was subsequently associated with it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: trophy33
Upvote 0

Apple Sky

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald
Site Supporter
Jan 7, 2024
1,497
169
south wales
✟38,605.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood

If one can be fake, it's makes one wonder about the rest.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums