Prove that links exist

[FutureAndAHope]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms. I have started this thread with the goal of showing there are not these transitions.

Could the Evolutionists in this thread put up links to the best-known transitions. I will not accept something like one example, how many creatures are there in the world? Millions, so we should have millions of transitions.

Also Horse and Dog evolution will not be accepted, due to the fact today we still have varying sizes of Dogs. Any size-based transition will be rejected. For it does not prove a change in type, only a change in size.

 

[pitabread]

By starting a thread by auto-rejecting transitional fossil sequences (which btw have a lot more to do with than mere size), you're setting the stage of a dishonest ask. I predict that no matter what is presented, you'll find an excuse to reject it.

Thus this thread is rather pointless.

 

[Occams Barber]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms. I have started this thread with the goal of showing there are not these transitions.

Could the Evolutionists in this thread put up links to the best-known transitions. I will not accept something like one example, how many creatures are there in the world? Millions, so we should have millions of transitions.

Also Horse and Dog evolution will not be accepted, due to the fact today we still have varying sizes of Dogs. Any size-based transition will be rejected. For it does not prove a change in type, only a change in size.

Could you explain what you mean by "transitional forms". If I read your post correctly you seem to be expecting a transitional form between a dinosaur and a man. I agree there is a vast difference between a dinosaur and a man. While dinosaurs and humans share a common ancestor (waaaay back in the past) there is no dinosaur to man transition.

Thank you.

OB

 

[pgp_protector]

From my understanding Man did NOT evolve from Dinosaurs

 

[Subduction Zone]

From my understanding Man did NOT evolve from Dinosaurs

Well that is disappointing

The good news? This is not a dinosaur:

 

[Hans Blaster]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms. I have started this thread with the goal of showing there are not these transitions.

Could the Evolutionists in this thread put up links to the best-known transitions. I will not accept something like one example, how many creatures are there in the world? Millions, so we should have millions of transitions.

Also Horse and Dog evolution will not be accepted, due to the fact today we still have varying sizes of Dogs. Any size-based transition will be rejected. For it does not prove a change in type, only a change in size.

Where did you get your information about what evolution says about transitional forms, because it's very messed up.

As others have noted, humans don't come from the dinosaur lineage. (But sparrows do.) So there should [not] be any "transitional forms" between dinosaur and man. The earliest mammals were tiny shrew-like creatures that did live at the same time as the later dinosaurs. They are our ancestors and there are numerous transitional forms between us and them.

 

[driewerf]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms. I have started this thread with the goal of showing there are not these transitions.

Could the Evolutionists in this thread put up links to the best-known transitions. I will not accept something like one example, how many creatures are there in the world? Millions, so we should have millions of transitions.

Also Horse and Dog evolution will not be accepted, due to the fact today we still have varying sizes of Dogs. Any size-based transition will be rejected. For it does not prove a change in type, only a change in size.

Blue and red sentences: So you start a thread to show something and shift the burden of proof to the other side. If you start a thread to show u something, then do so. Or is your position so weak that you don't even attempt?

 

[driewerf]

Well that is disappointing

The good news? This is not a dinosaur:

So we descend from that? That explains some characteristics of my boss.

 

[VirOptimus]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms. I have started this thread with the goal of showing there are not these transitions.

Could the Evolutionists in this thread put up links to the best-known transitions. I will not accept something like one example, how many creatures are there in the world? Millions, so we should have millions of transitions.

Also Horse and Dog evolution will not be accepted, due to the fact today we still have varying sizes of Dogs. Any size-based transition will be rejected. For it does not prove a change in type, only a change in size.

We are not responsible for your education.

You want to turn over the established science, write a paper for peer-review. If you cant, your views dont matter.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So we descend from that? That explains some characteristics of my boss.

I am not sure. We are more closely related to that then we are to dinosaurs.

 

[FutureAndAHope]

I am not suggesting you find a link between dinosaurs and man. As I am sure you will state we are descended from mammals not a direct descendent of Dinasours.

What I am stating is you need to give me the evidence. I am yet to see it. If you are so sure you can beat me you had better get your links up.

 

[FutureAndAHope]

By starting a thread by auto-rejecting transitional fossil sequences (which btw have a lot more to do with than mere size), you're setting the stage of a dishonest ask. I predict that no matter what is presented, you'll find an excuse to reject it.

Thus this thread is rather pointless.

Well get me my links.

 

[FutureAndAHope]

We are not responsible for your education.

You want to turn over the established science, write a paper for peer-review. If you cant, your views dont matter.

I don't need a peer reviews to have eyes and a brain. Don't leave yours at the door.

 

[Shemjaza]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms. I have started this thread with the goal of showing there are not these transitions.

Could the Evolutionists in this thread put up links to the best-known transitions. I will not accept something like one example, how many creatures are there in the world? Millions, so we should have millions of transitions.

Also Horse and Dog evolution will not be accepted, due to the fact today we still have varying sizes of Dogs. Any size-based transition will be rejected. For it does not prove a change in type, only a change in size.

Humans and chimps share a common ancestor. The extinct transitional hominid species are one of the sets of evidence for this:

 

[FutureAndAHope]

Well golly gosh, there are at least four? Rolls around the floor laughing.

Four Famous Transitional Fossils That Support Evolution

Well shoot me now, this has changed my mind:

List of transitional fossils - Wikipedia

Still laughing hysterically.

 

[FutureAndAHope]

Humans and chimps share a common ancestor. The extinct transitional hominid species are one of the sets of evidence for this:
View attachment 299653

Ok, I know to you this is evidence, but does a series of monkey skulls "prove", evolution? Everything has evolved, right? You must prove that. It is possible you have just found various species of monkey?

 

[Bradskii]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms.

We evolved from dinosaurs? Well then, Mr FutureAndAHope Evolutionist, if that's the case, then tell me how come there are still dinosaurs!

Edit: Oh, hang on. My bad. They died out apparently. Some mishap with a comet I've just been told.

But really, what is the point of starting a thread in which you state you want to deny evolution when you exhibit in the very first sentence that you know nothing at all about it. I'm embarressed for you...

 

[Shemjaza]

There is a vast difference between a Dinosaur and a man. If we are honest with ourselves there must be huge numbers of transitional forms. I have started this thread with the goal of showing there are not these transitions.

Could the Evolutionists in this thread put up links to the best-known transitions. I will not accept something like one example, how many creatures are there in the world? Millions, so we should have millions of transitions.

Also Horse and Dog evolution will not be accepted, due to the fact today we still have varying sizes of Dogs. Any size-based transition will be rejected. For it does not prove a change in type, only a change in size.

If you like dinosaurs, how about a transitional between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, archaeopteryx:

 

[Bradskii]

Well golly gosh, there are at least four? Rolls around the floor laughing.

Four Famous Transitional Fossils That Support Evolution

Well shoot me now, this has changed my mind:

List of transitional fossils - Wikipedia

Still laughing hysterically.

You're embarressing yourself further. Please stop.

 

[Shemjaza]

Ok, I know to you this is evidence, but does a series of monkey skulls "prove", evolution? Everything has evolved, right? You must prove that. It is possible you have just found various species of monkey?

Yeah, very, very human-like monkeys... and less-human-like... and still-less-human-like... and finally an animal structured very much like a chimp, except it walked upright almost like a human.

You asked for the transitions, and we have them.

We also have the genetic remnants in chimps, humans and neanderthals that have the same hall marks of relatedness we find in paternity tests.

The point is that we have the facts of evolution we can see in real time, and the evidence of the ancient past indicates that the same process can explain the larger time scale and body plan changes.